Herodotus: Difference between revisions
m (→herodotos in ALT repos: more clear formatting) |
(→Installation: The cache) |
||
Line 304: | Line 304: | ||
====Installation==== | ====Installation==== | ||
=====Cache of unpacked sources===== | |||
Whenever you invoke the "analysis" action of herodotos tool, it unpacks the sources to be analyzed. According to the {{path|study.hc.base}} template from {{pkg|herodotus-server}} package, the "cache" of the unpacked sources is located under {{path|/usr/src/HERODOTOS/INPUT/}} (one directory per project/package; one subdir per release) | |||
projects="/usr/src/HERODOTOS/INPUT" | |||
The same location (in the "cache") will appear in the paths in the results (in the .org format) of the "analyze" or "correlate" actions. So, if you explore the warnings in the results and want to view the corresponding source code, Emacs will open the file in the cache. | |||
This location must be writable by all users who run the "analyze" action themselves and readable (and maybe writable) by the "herodotus" user, under which the server runs the "correlate" action. |
Revision as of 16:01, 16 January 2020
(It's a work in progress.)
Herodotus is a project for tracking and linking analytic and synthetic facts about (the releases of) a package. The tracking is to be done independently per package. (Sisyphus is an example of a repository of packages where this can be applied.)
(Herodotus is inspired by, and partly based in the implementation, on herodotos tool. Note the different spelling of the name of this tool and of our project. Named after Herodotus.)
Introduction
- Which computed or external meta-information for a package is tracked
-
- Analytic facts (computed from the "internal" content of package releases):
- Static analysis of the C/C++ code (warnings):
- by coccinelle
- by cppcheck
- ...
- Discovery of source files which are not used during the build of the package (by means of strace or by the access time)
- ...
- Synthetic facts (added "externally" by maintainers)
- Resolutions for the warnings from the static analysis (a reason why they are invalid or a fix).
- ...
- Representation
-
- Each fact is linked to the corresponding Git (Gear) commit or tag.
- (The facts can be stored in the same Git repository in a separate branch.)
- If the "same" fact appears for several releases, all its occurrences are linked together, so that a maintainer can view them as a single fact. Only when the facts change between releases, it should need attention.
- User interfaces
-
- Files (obtained via Git), org-mode editor (Emacs; org-mode is like a personal wiki)
- ...
Implementation details
The core: herodotos tool
herodotos tool runs the analyzers for different releases and then links identical facts (modulo the diff, i.e., the changes of the source code).
Description of herodotos tool
- http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/papers/aosd10.pdf
- https://kernelnewbies.org/NicolasPalix (its developer; this page has a short description of the tool)
herodotos in ALT repos
herodotos in p8
- p8, test-only task #243195 herodotos
- Requires:
- p8 ocaml-bolt (Upstream: downloads;
darcs get http://bolt.x9c.fr/
) - p8 ocaml-parmap
- p8 (works, but not quite ready) ocaml-postgresql
- p8 ocaml-bolt (Upstream: downloads;
- Needed mainly for reproducing the author's experiments with Linux sources as a way of testing herodotos:
- Needed optionally for better correlation:
herodotos in p9
- Requires:
- p9, test-only task #243204 ocaml-bolt (Upstream: downloads;
darcs get http://bolt.x9c.fr/
) - p9 ocaml-parmap
- p9 (another version, ok?) ocaml-postgresql
- p9, test-only task #243204 ocaml-bolt (Upstream: downloads;
- Needed mainly for reproducing the author's experiments with Linux sources as a way of testing herodotos:
- Needed optionally for better correlation:
herodotos in Sisyphus
- Requires:
- sisyphus, test-only task #243205 ocaml-bolt (Upstream: downloads;
darcs get http://bolt.x9c.fr/
) - sisyphus ocaml-parmap
- sisyphus (another version, ok?) ocaml-postgresql
- sisyphus, test-only task #243205 ocaml-bolt (Upstream: downloads;
- Needed mainly for reproducing the author's experiments with Linux sources as a way of testing herodotos:
- sisyphus, test-only task #243259 coccinelle with support for embedded Python
- Needed optionally for better correlation:
How to try herodotos
One can install herodotos (for p8) from task 214330.
If you want to try herodotos, try to reproduce the authors' work https://github.com/coccinelle/faults-in-linux . (It is more recent; the older work http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/papers/aosd10.pdf with their data and configuration is not suitable for the current herodotos 0.8+ version.)
I've adapted their herodotos config files and made it a Gear repo: http://git.altlinux.org/people/imz/public/faults-in-Linux.git , so that one can easily pass it to hasher and do the processing in an isolated, easily reproducible hasher environment.
- First, prepare: clone my repo and and set up the sources for APT:
$ git clone --depth=20 git://git.altlinux.org/people/imz/public/faults-in-Linux.git $ cd faults-in-Linux $ apt-repo --hsh-apt-config=/home/imz/.hasher/p8/apt.conf add 214330
- Here is what the APT sources config for the hasher should be like (and our current working dir):
$ apt-repo --hsh-apt-config=/home/imz/.hasher/p8/apt.conf rpm [updates] file:/ALT/p8 x86_64 classic rpm [updates] file:/ALT/p8 noarch classic rpm http://git.altlinux.org repo/214330/x86_64 task $ pwd /space/home/imz/wip/2018-10-herodotos-cppcheck/faults-in-Linux
- Then, we execute the authors' processing rules (under the control of my .gear/faults-in-Linux.spec-file from the master branch; it automatically gets and checks out various revisions of the linux sources (so, you must have enough space to hold it):
$ export share_network=1 $ gear-hsh --apt-config=/home/imz/.hasher/p8/apt.conf --without-stuff 2>&1 | tee hsh.log.1
- It stops after the step of applying the static analyzer (coccinelle) to each version of the sources (linux). The results are saved at /usr/src/HERODOTOS/ (inside hasher). I've copied them and saved in commit ad458b0c2 in the EXPERI/imz2/apply-analyzer-results branch, so that you can look and get an idea what they look like:
- the individual per-version *.orig.org files.
/usr/src/HERODOTOS/ is used as the place to cache the analyzed sources and to save the (intermediate and final) results, so it won't be cleaned if you run gear --hasher | hsh-rebuild again (after editing the Git repo with the Makefiles, configs etc). (TODO: Unfortunately, the automatically filled faults/.projects_study.hc file is not relocatable in a similar manner.)
- The next step (correlation of the warnings between versions by herodotos) is to be run by us manually (because I wanted to have a possibility to first commit the results of the previous step):
hsh-shell --mount=/proc,/dev/pts cd /usr/src/RPM/BUILD/faults-in-Linux-20181023/faults/ make correl
- or as a single command:
hsh-run --mount=/proc -- sh -c 'cd /usr/src/RPM/BUILD/faults-in-Linux-20181023/faults/ && make correl'
- I saved the results in commit c3f5e56dd7e in the EXPERI/imz2/correl-gnudiff-results branch, so that you can look and get an idea what they look like:
- some non-empty *.correl.org files with undecided possible correlations (marked as
TODO
); - the *.new.org files with merged warnings from all versions. It is to be decided whether each of them (marked as
TODO
initially) is a real error or a false warning.
- some non-empty *.correl.org files with undecided possible correlations (marked as
(In this example, I made herodotos use the --diff gnudiff option, because the default better --diff hybrid requires gumtree and doesn't work correctly if it is absent.)
A follow-up scenario would be to first mark some warnings as checked and then add another version of the project into consideration (by editing the pattern in faults/study.hc.base) and see how the warnings concerning the new version are merged with the marks for the old versions. Let's explore this.
coccinelle support
coccinelle is natively supported by herodotos tool.
Actually, herodotos tool can work with any analyzer which gives output in the org-mode format.
coccinelle in Sisyphus
cppcheck support
- cppcheck is supported by flycheck (an Emacs package)
- flycheck can be hacked to output the information in the format suitable for herodotos tool (org-mode)
So, we could easily get the support for any analyzer known to flycheck.
cppcheck in Sisyphus
- cppcheck
- emacs-mode-flycheck
- flycheck output in org-mode format
Discovery of source files which are not used during the build of the package
Either builds under strace can be used to discover files which are not used, or the access time (an idea by boyarsh@, which has already been probably implemented by him).
Extensions to be implemented
Ad hoc sources for herodotos
Ad hoc ways to feed herodotos some specific sources (which are not covered by the configuration "*SCM" and "versions" parameters):
herodotos preinit-add git REPO TAG herodotos preinit-add rpm-bp FILE herodotos preinit-add srpm FILE
More; easy to implement; but not really needed much (as for now):
herodotos preinit-add rpm-bp+gear REPO TAG herodotos preinit-add srpm+gear REPO TAG
Here, the way the git option is processed is similar to how the git:
sources from the configuration are treated. (An exercise in implementing preinit-add on the base of the existing code.)
The rpm-bp option would invoke rpm to prepare the source tree (with all the patches applied etc. by performing the prep
stage with rpmbuild -bp, optionally under hasher); the srpm option is about a stupid unpacking of an .src.rpm and of the archives it contains. The +gear options are about getting the srpm from a Gear repo.
More methods for herodotos to get sources
In the spirit of the current way to write the configuration file, in addition to git:
(combined with versions
to select the tags), one could implement more methods for herodotos to get sources from some other kinds of repositories:
-
rpm-bp+gear:
(orsrpm+gear:
) - the Sisyphus (and branches) archive (whereby the repo index might help to learn the releases and their place in the archive).
This could be useful for a more automated study of packages from Sisyphus and branches.
Usage
Herodotus as server
Think of the work with Herodotus as a server (which is in some respect similar to girar).
The main task of the server is to store the analysis of a package (for each known package) in a "normal" form, i.e., after having done the best effort of correlating the analyses for each known version (release) of the package.
The stored analysis of a package can be updated upon request with new information. Most commonly, the new information is:
- a new analysis of a specific new version (release) of the package;
- or additional manual correlations between warnings from the old analyses.
After getting new information, the Herodotus server must "normalize" it (i.e., make the best effort to automatically correlate) and save.
The Herodotus server uses a Git repository for each package as a way to store the current and past states of the analysis of this package.
Action: "update" (performed by the server)
(Applicable for each individual package. Parameter: a branch name, which is to be updated.)
- Result
- a "normal" (automatically correlated) analysis in the top commit of the specified branch (on the server).
- Input
- a Git commit with analysis results (and optional correlations) in herodotos format. (The old head of the Git branch on the server should be an ancestor of this new Git commit.)
The Git commit that comes as an input to the "update" action can be created by the "analyze" action described below.
Action: "analyze" (performed anywhere)
(Applicable for each version (release) of each individual package.)
- Result
- a Git commit containing an analysis of the specified version (release) of the package in herodotos format.
- Input
- a herodotos config with a specification of the version (release) of the package to be analyzed.
Commonly, one creates the commit with the analysis of a new version (release) on top of a previous commit with old analyses.
Manual action: edit the analyses or correlations in herodotos format
A special Emacs mode (extension to org-mode) can be used to do this conveniently, side-by-side with exploring the actual corresponding source code.
herodotus-server commands
herodotus-server.git contains scripts and related data that represent the model of Herodotus as a server.
- herodotus-update
- herodotus-helper-analyze-each (automatically runs cppcheck for each known version (release) of a package)
herodotus-helper-analyze-each
herodotus-helper-analyze-each STEM PKGNAME
automatically runs cppcheck for each known version (release) of a package (and saves the results).
It is to be run inside a Git repository. It is possibly an empty directory. It will re-initialized as a Git repo.
STEM
is the stem of the Git branch name, which will be used to save the results. (At the same time, it is used to get the sources from this branch in the ALT archive.)
PKGNAME
is the name of the package to be analyzed. (The srpms are taken from the ALT archive.)
Example of a one-shot use of herodotus-helper-analyze-each
Example: analyze each release in the history of package "anacron" in ALT c7 branch:
$ mkdir anacron $ cd anacron/ $ /home/imz/wip/2018-10-herodotos-cppcheck/herodotus-server/herodotus-helper-analyze-each c7 anacron
What herodotus-helper-analyze-each has done internally
(It has invoked various tools in a way similar to how the author of herodotos used it to analyze the Linux kernel sources.)
It has looked up the list of the known versions (releases) in c7/index/src/a/anacron/d-t-s-evr.list under /usr/src/HERODOTOS/INPUT/anacron/../ALT/repo/ (the path is constructed according to the configuration in study.hc.base from herodotus-server.git); here is what it has seen there (so that you better understand what has been going on):
$ cat /usr/src/HERODOTOS/INPUT/anacron/../ALT/repo/c7/index/src/a/anacron/d-t-s-evr.list 1381657390 105852 - 1:2.3-alt6 $
It has cached the unpacked/"prepared" sources of each of the releases under /usr/src/HERODOTOS/INPUT/anacron/
$ ls -l /usr/src/HERODOTOS/INPUT/anacron/ total 0 drwxrwxrwx 5 imz imz 260 дек 21 2018 anacron-1@2.3-alt6 $
(One kind of trick or another is needed if you want to share the cache between multiple users of the system. TODO: describe them in details.)
Then it has run the analyzer on each of the versions (releases) of the sources; in this case, it has been cppcheck (according to the configuration in study.hc.base from herodotus-server.git).
Results of herodotus-helper-analyze-each
It has made a Git commit with the results:
$ git ls-files .depend .depend.erase .depend.patterns .projects_study.hc RESULTS/anacron/.depend.Linux RESULTS/anacron/Linux_cppcheck.orig.org RESULTS/anacron/anacron-1@2.3-alt6/Linux_cppcheck.log RESULTS/anacron/anacron-1@2.3-alt6/Linux_cppcheck.orig.org study.hc $
It has saved the analysis (done by cppcheck) of each release, namely, of the single known release in this case:
$ cat RESULTS/anacron/anacron-1\@2.3-alt6/Linux_cppcheck.orig.org * TODO [[view:/usr/src/HERODOTOS/INPUT/anacron/anacron-1@2.3-alt6/anacron/matchrx.c::face=ovl-face1::linb=52::colb=1::cole=2][Memory leak: sub_offsets]] $
(TODO: of course, analyzing deleted packages seems like a strange behavior, so it should be fixed. But we show it here nevertheless just for the demonstration of the structure of the results.)
All results from all releases will be put together in a single common file after correlation (the "update" action on the Herodotus server), which we haven't done yet; so, it is empty for now:
$ wc -l RESULTS/anacron/Linux_cppcheck.orig.org 0 RESULTS/anacron/Linux_cppcheck.orig.org $
herodotus-update
Test example: correlating cppcheck histories for each package in a repository branch
Installation
Cache of unpacked sources
Whenever you invoke the "analysis" action of herodotos tool, it unpacks the sources to be analyzed. According to the study.hc.base template from herodotus-server package, the "cache" of the unpacked sources is located under /usr/src/HERODOTOS/INPUT/ (one directory per project/package; one subdir per release)
projects="/usr/src/HERODOTOS/INPUT"
The same location (in the "cache") will appear in the paths in the results (in the .org format) of the "analyze" or "correlate" actions. So, if you explore the warnings in the results and want to view the corresponding source code, Emacs will open the file in the cache.
This location must be writable by all users who run the "analyze" action themselves and readable (and maybe writable) by the "herodotus" user, under which the server runs the "correlate" action.